Silversmithing with Ray Walton
30 April 2026, 16:00This is the final article in my series about my Arts Council England ‘Developing Your Creative Practice’ (DYCP) project entitled ‘learning to make a (hallmarked) silver natural trumpet in order to build skills, preserve specialist knowledge, rejuvenate a highly endangered craft, and develop as a musician and instrument maker’. This long title was inspired by the premise of Johann Joachim Quantz’s Versuch einer Anweisung die Flöte traversiere zu spielen (1752) in which he gave ‘instructions for playing the flute, and for becoming a good musician at the same time’ (my italics) [(‘Essay of a Method for Playing the Transverse Flute’), Quantz (1752) trans. Reilly (1985), p. 11].
Having given myself the challenge of making a solid silver trumpet, I had set my sights on attempting to replicate one of the most highly decorated English trumpets extant: a silver trumpet made in London (Londini Fecit) by William Bull (1650–1712)—now owned by Warwickshire Museum and currently in storage at the Market Hall Museum in Warwick. I visited the museum to measure the instrument on 13 October 2025 and spent much of the time before my first visit to Ray Walton’s workshop designing models, making tools, 3D printing jigs, and finalising drawings that would help me realise this ambitious project.
Ray seemed pleasantly surprised by the extent of the preparatory drawings and tooling that I had completed. He studied my dimensioned technical drawings and very kindly telephoned me a few times in advance of the first session to talk about the silver I would require, and to discuss the general approach.
Even as I unloaded the contents of the various boxes I had brought with me, I could tell that Ray would be an incredibly attentive and excellent teacher. He was interested in how I would approach making the tubes, the bows, the garland, and the bell of the trumpet, in addition to the ornamental ball that we would be focusing on together. I explained my plan for each component of the trumpet and showed him many of the tools that I had brought with me: he offered ideas, guidance, and suggestions, and was able to gauge my overall level of experience from my answers. What was particularly refreshing with Ray was that he was always open-minded about ideas and approaches: ‘There’s more than one way to do everything’, as he put it.
From this initial discussion, it became clear that I had a good understanding of the engineering aspects of trumpet making but that I still had much to learn about the more decorative elements. I would need to adapt my skills and learn techniques associated with more decorative silversmithing work, developing the refinement and fine-detail craftsmanship more commonly associated with jewellery making. I would also need to apply the knowledge and skills I had acquired working with brass to the properties of silver—particularly in soldering, where many of the underlying principles are similar in theory, but the techniques and characteristics of the solders differ in practice.
I had purchased the silver discs required for the ball, which we had discussed over the telephone. I also cut discs of the same dimensions out from a sheet of brass. We discussed whether to start directly with the silver discs or whether to work on a brass prototype first. We decided to start in brass, and I began raising two of the larger discs to make a matched pair of hemispheres using the head of a large steel hammer mounted in the vice as a stake, and a hammer that Ray had made out of lignum vitae, an exceptionally dense wood native to the Caribbean and parts of South America. Since I was using a relatively thin gauge of metal and the two hemispheres would need to be soldered together to form a sphere, it was especially important not to thin the metal near the seam, which could easily happen if using a metal hammer.
Having formed a hemisphere using this historical method, we discussed whether this would be the most practical approach in the modern day, or whether spinning on the lathe would be preferable. This led to a discussion about what would be most historically appropriate for a replica of a trumpet from c.1700. Metal spinning became widespread during the nineteenth century (as a result of the Industrial Revolution and the advent of increasingly powerful, often steam-powered, machinery), though spinning may have existed in earlier less powerful forms. John Anderson described metal spinning in 1869 as a process that had been ‘invented in France only a few years ago’, though earlier forms may have existed. Source: Anderson, John (1869) ‘Metal Spinning’, Scientific American, 11 December 1869.
While we were discussing this subject, I showed Ray an engraving of a trumpet maker (in my book, ‘Just’ Natural Trumpet), a reproduction from Abbildung Der Gemein-Nützlichen Haupt-Stände (‘Illustration of the principal trades’) by Christoph Weigel (1654–1725), an engraver and publisher from Nuremberg—once the most important centre for brass instrument making.
Ray explained that spinning was a much more modern solution and he showed me how it could be done using his Colchester ‘Student’ lathe (noting that it is bad practice to use an engineering lathe for spinning, but that you can get away with it if using a relatively thin gauge of metal). It was good to gain experience of both methods, and it is worth noting that the hemispheres could equally have been formed using a die-stamping method, though we did not try this.
We stopped for lunch, which entailed a short walk through the centre of Faversham to a nice independent sandwich shop where Ray was on first name terms. We walked back and sat on a table just outside the café above the workshop, enjoying the best weather of the year so far. We discussed the tools that I would need to make for the rolling mill to achieve the textured patterns on the ferrules and ball stem. When we went back into the workshop, Ray showed me various examples that he has made for similar applications in the past.
After lunch, Ray gave me an introduction to silver soldering. He wrote ‘E’, ‘H’, ‘M’ and ‘Easy’ on the back of an envelope, where I was to place cleaned paillons of ‘enamelling’, ‘hard’, ‘medium’, and ‘easy’ solder on top of a small scrap of silver sheet. I was slightly surprised that he used ‘medium’ solder, as I had recently been told that many silversmiths do not use it because it doesn’t seem to flow as well as ‘easy’ or ‘hard’ solder. He suspected that I would see why it was so useful after this experiment. Ray talked me through the exercise; I was to make each solder flow in turn, starting with the ‘easy’ solder and finishing with the ‘enamelling’. Once I had done this in a methodical manner, Ray asked me to reheat each of the solders to show which would run again and which seemed to resist the temptation.
The ‘easy’ and ‘hard’ solders will flow repeatedly, but 'enamelling’ and ‘medium’ become reluctant to reflow as heating alters their composition and depletes their low-melting constituents. Once that exercise had been completed, Ray encouraged me to go too far and burn the silver by overheating it, in order to observe the changes in colour on the approach to (what would normally be) disaster. This was also a valuable exercise.
For the next exercise, I formed four W-shaped pieces of silver and soldered them onto another scrap of silver sheet, using a different type of solder for each one to solder them side by side. This was also a useful exercise, both in soldering and in getting used to the idiosyncrasies of Ray’s gas torch. I had never used a gas torch exactly like his before; it was similar to the torches I used on the course at West Dean College, however Ray’s had a pilot light, and a button to control the mix of compressed air and gas, which took a lot of getting used to for me. The dial also turned the opposite direction to the Sievert gas torch I have at home—so the end of my soldering operations would often be accompanied by a roar of flames. The engravers were fortunately unfazed by this sudden sound!
Before the first day drew to a close, I recommenced working on the brass hemispheres; Ray set up his height gauge and showed me how to mark a concentric line on each. I then used a jeweller’s frame saw to cut along the line to remove the excess material. This took a bit of practice, and I broke more than a few blades along the way. At home, I would normally do this on the lathe, using a parting-off tool to ensure a clean cut, with the work mounted on a nylon mandrel. Given my first attempts with the frame saw, which left much to be desired, perhaps I will revert to this in the future. However, there will be many other aspects of the design of the ball which will require the use of the frame saw.
Just before we left the workshop for the day, Ray showed me a book entitled ‘A Silversmith’s Manual’ by Bernard Cuzner (first published in 1935), which he leant to me to look at overnight, along with Theophilus’ twelfth century text, On Divers Arts—the most important medieval treatise on painting, glassmaking, and metalwork. These texts encompassed the philosophies of the day, as we had been using methods both ancient and modern. It seemed particularly apt that Cuzner used the analogy of musicians’ coordination to explain the agility, dexterity and harmony between the mind and body. It is also apt that this short extract continues to mention the very same dilemma I was faced with: whether to start out learning in silver or whether to use brass (gilding metal is a form of brass) at first:
We sat outside the pub, enjoying the good weather, and several people he knew passed by and stopped for a chat. Ray is very well known in the local community of Faversham, and I met all sorts of people, including a man who has professionally photographed many of Ray’s works. Ray showed me his own unique business card which folded out to reveal many photographs of his works, including a very impressive chased lion.
Ray and I chatted about all sorts of things, including music, family life, freelancing, Time Team, and Cambodia! It transpired that Ray has appeared on the Channel 4 television series Time Team, and his son lives and brews beer in Cambodia—we both reminisced about our visits there. After dinner, I retired to a hotel and pub called The Quay, right next to Creek Creative. I had a room booked there and I spent much of the evening delving into the two books that Ray had loaned me overnight: A Silversmith’s Manual by Bernard Cuzner and On Divers Arts by Theophilus. I also searched YouTube for Ray’s appearance on Time Team. He can be seen raising a replica of a Bronze Age bucket at 17:14, 37:49, and 43:12 in series 9, episode 13, ‘Seven Buckets and a Buckle’, filmed at Breamore, Hampshire, in 2002.
We set up the soldering hearth with fixtures for holding the hemispheres together and used ‘easy’ silver solder to complete the task. The revolving soldering hearth was very helpful and I resolved to find a rotating solution for my own workshop as soon as I got home. Ray’s comprised a large kiln shelf placed on top of a thick circular piece of steel: which was held in place by a central bar mounted in the jaws of an old (heavy) lathe chuck.
After soldering, the large ball was pickled and cleaned and I removed the excess solder by filing. We then looked for a way to fill it with pitch without setting the newly fitted smoke alarms off. We decided that it would be best to use the electric heat gun that I had brought with me to melt the pitch in an old tin can. Ray fashioned a spout in the can and we blocked off one end of the ball with masking tape. Ray put a metal plate beneath in case it spilled everywhere; we filled the ball with pitch and pushed a cylindrical steel bar through it. Unfortunately, it made a bit of a mess. Ray mentioned that I would certainly be able to think of a better way to do this in the future, and I have since come up with a method that catches the drips as well.
We spent the rest of the day making chasing tools for this specific application: firstly a D-shaped planishing tool and secondly an internally domed tool for outlining small decorative spheres on the workpiece. The first was formed by forging, and this was the first time I had seen this being done. Ray held a piece of steel in a pair of locking grips, and heated the steel tool to red heat. He then hammered it against an anvil while it was hot to narrow the material around the tip of the tool. He re-heated the steel tool and hammered it again until the required reduction had been achieved; files were then used to shape and refine the tip of the tool. Once we were happy with the shape and had used the tool in situ for a short while, Ray showed me how to harden the tool by taking it up to red heat and quenching it in water. He then showed me how to temper it, using a tiny pilot flame to heat the tool until a straw colour could be seen; this tempering of the tool prevents it from becoming too brittle.
We referred to my technical drawing quite regularly while we were making the chasing tools. Since the drawing was printed at a 1:1 scale, measurements could be taken from it, and tools could be offered up against it. The orthographic projections, showing the ball from different angles, were especially useful for seeing the outer parts of the ball that I nicknamed the ‘dominoes’, and the spheres and diamonds along the main seam could be seen more clearly from the top-down view. Ray remarked once again that it was great to have such clear drawings. I rely on modern technology to help me produce drawings; Ray is a wonderful artist, and I was amazed by his ability to render his drawings with lifelike shading, just using a pencil. These are some examples of his workpieces and preliminary drawings:
Sarah, one of the engravers Ray shares the workshop with, was keen to hear me play the trumpet before she left to go home, so I played one of the pair of Victorian silver trumpets I own, made by Henry Potter. I think they enjoyed the spectacle and her father, David, was particularly impressed by the engraving on the trumpet, which showcases a variety of fonts. They took a look at it under loupes and were suitably impressed. I asked Ray, David, and Sarah about how I might mark out the elaborate design on the ball and they each offered some excellent tips. I also had my design for the garland with me (ready for my trip to see Miriam), and I asked Sarah how she would go about marking it out. Printing it onto the concave surface of the garland would be basically impossible, so she suggested that the best thing I could do would be to cut the printed design into small pieces (carefully matching the different parts of the design together) and trace them on with a scriber.
I left Faversham with two new tools, a soldered brass hemisphere (now filled with pitch), and a wealth of new ideas and inspiration. I marked the ball out in full when I got home, and had a go at chasing the basic design into it, with some success. We had also taken the opportunity to spin two silver hemispheres while I was at Ray’s workshop, but I tried to make these from smaller sized discs that ultimately turned out to be too small. However, this gave me chance to follow the same steps as I did in Faversham, though this time working in silver. I was pleased with my silver soldering attempts at home, and it made sense for me to use the Sievert torch I was most accustomed to for this delicate operation.
After my first two days of lessons with Ray, I had two weeks until the last three days of my chasing and repoussé lessons with Miriam Hanid in Suffolk. I would be returning to study with Ray Walton the week after that, and as I wrote in my blog about my time studying with Miriam, I came back to Ray’s workshop with a lot more experience:
The ball, filled with pitch and mounted on a round bar, had a tendency to work free from the bar it was mounted on. We looked for an alternative solution to this and tried using firstly a threaded bar and later a square section bar to try and prevent the pitch from sliding along.
The central seam of the main ball is adorned with alternating patterns comprising spheres and diamonds; Ray showed me how to make a sphere by firstly outlining it using a hollow circular tool, and then pushing the background gradually away from it to leave an island-like high point behind; this was, at first, a hugely gradual process and much less satisfying than using repoussé to create the height. The D-shaped tool that we made on 9 April was invaluable for pushing the background down to expose these domed spheres. I used tools from Ray’s extensive collection as well, and we made copies of the most useful tools for my own collection. Once I had produced a few dome-shaped mounds by pushing the surrounding metal down, Ray showed me how they could be refined using small scraping and burnishing tools. These kinds of tools would have been available to William Bull, as opposed to using modern rotary shaft tools for removing scratches or for polishing. Ray loaned me his magnifying visor and I worked on the ball at x4 magnification; this was quite a comfortable level and just right for the distance I was working at.
While I had been working on the chasing, Ray was suggesting tools for me to use, and making copies of the most useful ones for me to take home. He had also been using his lignum vitae hammers to try to salvage a garland disc that I had damaged (and torn) while attempting to spin—I was in a hurry before going to Miriam’s workshop (which is mentioned in that blog post). With a tear and some folds in it, I thought it would be fit only for scrap, but Ray took it on as a side project. He gradually repaired it throughout the day, while I was chasing or otherwise occupied. I was amazed that he managed to restore it from a fairly crumpled mess, and he even repaired the torn area by soldering in a sliver of silver, which he had rolled down to fit the gap using his rolling mill. He mentioned an adage about silversmithing that reminded me of what Frank Tomes (who made my natural trumpet) used to say—something along the lines of ‘making a trumpet bell isn’t really about knowing what to do when it goes well, it’s about knowing what to do to rescue it when it starts to go badly’.
We spent much of the rest of the afternoon forging more tools for the planishing and texturing processes, and trying out ideas and tools to create the desired effect on the largest ball. I had also formed four smaller silver hemispheres, and I prepared these by lapping them into equal hemispheres, ready for soldering.
Ray and I retired to The Bear Inn and we carried on socially from where we left off. It was great to learn more about Ray and his life as a freelance silversmith. This time we talked about everything from career progression, The Holy Tavern (formerly The Jerusalem Tavern) in Clerkenwell, and him becoming a Freeman of the City of London (he’s never driven sheep over London Bridge but, as I recall, wasn’t ruling it out). The conversation flowed easily and it was a pleasure to get to know this kind, gentle, modest, and fascinating gentleman a little better, and we sent Miriam a photo after a fulfilling day of work.
Having already lapped the small hemispheres, I was ready to start the day by soldering them. I did this carefully and was pleased with the results. I realised that what had initially been putting me off with Ray’s gas torch was actually its loud sound. Ray’s torch sounded louder than what I was used to and even the small flame that I used for soldering the smallest ball together sounded like a comparative inferno: it sounded like my torch would sound if it was on the largest flame. I dared to change the proportion of compressed air in the mix by letting the button out, and this altered the intensity of the heat. At home, I would do this by varying the distance I was away from the soldering joint. It took quite a bit of faith to continue soldering with such a loud infernal roar coming from the torch, but I eventually allowed myself to ignore the sound of it and look for physical cues (colour, oxidation, borax bubbles etc.), and the solder soon began to flow.
And flow it did! The solder flowed well on both small balls, and I left them to pickle while I prepared the pitch. I had a new and improved system for pouring the pitch inside the balls. This system involved two cast iron pans, one used to pour from above and the other to collect the excess below. I had 3D-printed a fixture to help hold the workpiece vertically in the lower pan. The system worked well and the role of the pans could be reversed the next time they were required. I left the pitch-filled balls to cool for a while, and Ray and I discussed the texturing for the garland, and whether this ought to match the texturing used on the ball, to give continuity between these decorative aspects of the trumpet—a very good idea.
I had arrived at Ray’s a short time after studying with Miriam Hanid, and the brass garland that I had been working on was still held in pitch on my pitch bowl, ready for post-repoussé planishing and texturing work. I brought it in to show Ray: he looked at it carefully and examined the tools that Miriam, Alice, and I had made on my last day in Lowestoft. We tried the texturing tools methodically and Ray hardened and tempered them for me once we were happy with them. It is amazing what a difference that the texturing makes to the overall appearance of the piece. I continued working on this for some time, and used some of the tools from Ray’s collection as well. He also offered me the use of a small angled wooden holder that he had made to hold chasing tools up towards the chaser: this was an inspired idea. When I got home I designed and 3D-printed a case for my chasing tools that could be folded back on itself to hold the tools up at a similar angle so they could be seen end-on and more easily identified.
I retrieved the two small silver balls from the pickle and marked them out using a helix-shaped guide that I had 3D printed; this allowed me to easily mark the fluted pattern onto the metal despite the extreme curvature of the piece. I used the fluting tools that I had used extensively on the course at West Dean College, and began to chase the fluting into the balls. Ray suggested that I could be a lot more confident with the hammering, and this improved the quality of the work considerably. Once again, this was a fantastic example of Ray’s teaching style: the right advice came at the right time. I was delighted that I managed to get the small balls soldered, filled with pitch, and ready for chasing. Before I studied with Ray, I had no idea how the kind of chasing seen on the William Bull trumpet ball could be achieved; it was great to explore this under Ray’s guidance. Sarah kindly took some photographs of me and Ray in the workshop; I am holding the various brass and silver test pieces that I had been working on.
I left feeling fully satisfied and hugely positive about the project. I hadn’t completed the entire ball assembly, but that was not the purpose of the visit. I came away with the knowledge and confidence that I needed in order to be able to continue the work at home, and that was exactly what I had hoped to achieve from the outset. Ray has been so generous with his time, in fielding preliminary calls, on each workshop day, and in offering remote support in the future. He is also positive, pragmatic, talented, and inspiring. You simply couldn’t ask for more than that. I also really enjoyed sharing the workshop with the engravers David Bedford and Sarah Hobbs. This is a great partnership, and it was great to meet both of them as well. As I left, Ray said ‘All the best Russell, and please send us a photo when the baby is born’—what a lovely, caring gentleman he is.
This has been a remarkable (Wanderjahre-esque) opportunity and I have learnt a great deal from all of the makers I studied with: Malcolm Appleby, Julian Stephens, Miriam Hanid, and Ray Walton. I would like to extend a huge thank you to Arts Council England for this incredible opportunity.
This article begins with an overview of the wider project before an in-depth account of the inspiring time I spent with Ray Walton at his workshop in Faversham. It begins with a reminiscence from Göttingen and it was written, rather appropriately, during some quieter moments of the Göttingen Handel Festival (10–25 May 2026) after a busy April studying with Ray Walton (8–9 and 29–30 April 2026) and Miriam Hanid (21–23 April 2026).
Several years ago, I remember sitting outside a café in the main square in Göttingen with my friend, colleague, and former trumpet teacher (now my trumpet-making teacher), David Staff. We saw some men walk past in traditional dress (flared trousers and wide brimmed hats), carrying a wooden hiking pole with twists resembling narwhal tusks. I asked Staffy if he knew why they were dressed like this and what it signified. We had no idea, so we asked the waiter in the café, who explained that they were wearing the attire of a wayfaring carpenter (Zimmermann). We found out that craftspersons such as carpenters who had passed their apprenticeships often undertook a kind of grand tour, for at least three years and a day, as wandering journeymen—the term derives from the French word journée (‘day’), referring to a worker paid by the day rather than a master who owned his own workshop. This time-honoured travel tradition, known as the Wanderjahre or Walz, has continued in various crafts and trades in Germany. It is part of their etiquette to conduct themselves well in public and to wear this distinctive uniform. As a result, several other crafts and trades have adopted the traditional clothing of the carpenter for their Walz, since it is easily recognised and well-respected by people who might offer lifts to hitchhikers.
Since the Middle Ages, journeymen who hoped to achieve master status were often expected to travel between towns in order to broaden their experience by working in a variety of workshops, often for six months at a time. I can imagine that if you had completed your apprenticeship solely with your father, for example, you would learn only his methods of working. However, if you travelled to study with various other masters, you would encounter different tools and unfamiliar artistic styles, methods, and techniques: you would also undoubtedly find new sources of inspiration along the way, from impressive examples of craftsmanship or by studying magnificent buildings (something like Cologne Cathedral, for example) en route. After completing the Wanderjahre (basically a series of itinerant internships), you could return home with more knowledge and inspiration than you may have gleaned from studying with a single master in your original vicinity. Incidentally, tradition dictates that the wanderer should embark and return with a token sum of money upon their person (formerly five marks, now five euros), to show that this journey was completed purely for the experience—the journey cost you nothing but paid for itself.
Seeing those carpenters and reading about their training traditions made me think about how I could further myself as a trumpet maker. I felt that the time was right for me to diversify and learn some additional skills because I am now able to make a complete natural trumpet in brass, and I have the vast majority of the tools required to do this in my well-equipped but small workshop. I have learnt a great deal about trumpet making from David Staff (and, briefly, from Frank Tomes and Graham Nicholson) and I wondered what it would be like to study with jewellers, silversmiths, engravers, and chasing and repoussé specialists. I hoped to study with experienced craftspersons in several of these disciplines, learning not only how each artisan practises their craft and approaches their workload, but also how they organise their workshops, exhibit their work, operate their businesses, engage with customers, and preserve and elevate their craft for future generations.
I specifically hoped to improve my engraving, as I was largely self-taught. I loved the idea of attending one of Miriam Hanid’s chasing and repoussé courses, but knew that I could not justify prioritising this without financial assistance. I also knew that I would require specialist help with some of the most decorative elements of a silver trumpet.
A plan came together and I decided to apply for an Arts Council England ‘Developing Your Creative Practice’ (DYCP) grant. I had prior experience of this programme as I had been awarded a DYCP grant in 2021 which culminated in my book, ‘Just’ Natural Trumpet. One evening I was researching how long I would have to wait before I could apply for a second DYCP project proposal, and by sheer luck I visited the Arts Council England website just two days before the deadline for the first new round that I was eligible to apply for! I wrote a thorough application in record time, and was delighted that it was successful. The application detailed my plan to approach the aforementioned four areas of study: engraving, chasing and repoussé, trumpet making, and silversmithing.
Receiving the DYCP grant made the project possible and I followed the original proposal very closely: I spent three days in October 2025 improving my engraving with Malcolm Appleby; I received an introduction to silversmithing (and explored ferrule making) with Julian Stephens at West Dean College in March 2026; and I spent four days studying chasing and repoussé, focusing on the trumpet’s garland, with Miriam Hanid.
My final tutored sessions would be to focus on the silversmithing techniques required to make the ornamental ball of the trumpet. Making this component would involve complex elements of forming and soldering, in addition to some fairly advanced chasing, planishing, and texturing techniques. Since I was interested in understanding the traditional methods involved in making a trumpet from the late seventeenth or early eighteenth century, Miriam Hanid suggested that I should talk to Ray Walton, a silversmith with considerable experience in restoration and conservation work. He has worked on numerous historic artefacts, including the Canterbury Mace (1665) and two Faversham maces from 1650 and 1755. I arranged to visit him at his workshop for a pair of two-day sessions in April.
Several years ago, I remember sitting outside a café in the main square in Göttingen with my friend, colleague, and former trumpet teacher (now my trumpet-making teacher), David Staff. We saw some men walk past in traditional dress (flared trousers and wide brimmed hats), carrying a wooden hiking pole with twists resembling narwhal tusks. I asked Staffy if he knew why they were dressed like this and what it signified. We had no idea, so we asked the waiter in the café, who explained that they were wearing the attire of a wayfaring carpenter (Zimmermann). We found out that craftspersons such as carpenters who had passed their apprenticeships often undertook a kind of grand tour, for at least three years and a day, as wandering journeymen—the term derives from the French word journée (‘day’), referring to a worker paid by the day rather than a master who owned his own workshop. This time-honoured travel tradition, known as the Wanderjahre or Walz, has continued in various crafts and trades in Germany. It is part of their etiquette to conduct themselves well in public and to wear this distinctive uniform. As a result, several other crafts and trades have adopted the traditional clothing of the carpenter for their Walz, since it is easily recognised and well-respected by people who might offer lifts to hitchhikers.
Since the Middle Ages, journeymen who hoped to achieve master status were often expected to travel between towns in order to broaden their experience by working in a variety of workshops, often for six months at a time. I can imagine that if you had completed your apprenticeship solely with your father, for example, you would learn only his methods of working. However, if you travelled to study with various other masters, you would encounter different tools and unfamiliar artistic styles, methods, and techniques: you would also undoubtedly find new sources of inspiration along the way, from impressive examples of craftsmanship or by studying magnificent buildings (something like Cologne Cathedral, for example) en route. After completing the Wanderjahre (basically a series of itinerant internships), you could return home with more knowledge and inspiration than you may have gleaned from studying with a single master in your original vicinity. Incidentally, tradition dictates that the wanderer should embark and return with a token sum of money upon their person (formerly five marks, now five euros), to show that this journey was completed purely for the experience—the journey cost you nothing but paid for itself.
Seeing those carpenters and reading about their training traditions made me think about how I could further myself as a trumpet maker. I felt that the time was right for me to diversify and learn some additional skills because I am now able to make a complete natural trumpet in brass, and I have the vast majority of the tools required to do this in my well-equipped but small workshop. I have learnt a great deal about trumpet making from David Staff (and, briefly, from Frank Tomes and Graham Nicholson) and I wondered what it would be like to study with jewellers, silversmiths, engravers, and chasing and repoussé specialists. I hoped to study with experienced craftspersons in several of these disciplines, learning not only how each artisan practises their craft and approaches their workload, but also how they organise their workshops, exhibit their work, operate their businesses, engage with customers, and preserve and elevate their craft for future generations.
I specifically hoped to improve my engraving, as I was largely self-taught. I loved the idea of attending one of Miriam Hanid’s chasing and repoussé courses, but knew that I could not justify prioritising this without financial assistance. I also knew that I would require specialist help with some of the most decorative elements of a silver trumpet.
A plan came together and I decided to apply for an Arts Council England ‘Developing Your Creative Practice’ (DYCP) grant. I had prior experience of this programme as I had been awarded a DYCP grant in 2021 which culminated in my book, ‘Just’ Natural Trumpet. One evening I was researching how long I would have to wait before I could apply for a second DYCP project proposal, and by sheer luck I visited the Arts Council England website just two days before the deadline for the first new round that I was eligible to apply for! I wrote a thorough application in record time, and was delighted that it was successful. The application detailed my plan to approach the aforementioned four areas of study: engraving, chasing and repoussé, trumpet making, and silversmithing.
Receiving the DYCP grant made the project possible and I followed the original proposal very closely: I spent three days in October 2025 improving my engraving with Malcolm Appleby; I received an introduction to silversmithing (and explored ferrule making) with Julian Stephens at West Dean College in March 2026; and I spent four days studying chasing and repoussé, focusing on the trumpet’s garland, with Miriam Hanid.
My final tutored sessions would be to focus on the silversmithing techniques required to make the ornamental ball of the trumpet. Making this component would involve complex elements of forming and soldering, in addition to some fairly advanced chasing, planishing, and texturing techniques. Since I was interested in understanding the traditional methods involved in making a trumpet from the late seventeenth or early eighteenth century, Miriam Hanid suggested that I should talk to Ray Walton, a silversmith with considerable experience in restoration and conservation work. He has worked on numerous historic artefacts, including the Canterbury Mace (1665) and two Faversham maces from 1650 and 1755. I arranged to visit him at his workshop for a pair of two-day sessions in April.
Having given myself the challenge of making a solid silver trumpet, I had set my sights on attempting to replicate one of the most highly decorated English trumpets extant: a silver trumpet made in London (Londini Fecit) by William Bull (1650–1712)—now owned by Warwickshire Museum and currently in storage at the Market Hall Museum in Warwick. I visited the museum to measure the instrument on 13 October 2025 and spent much of the time before my first visit to Ray Walton’s workshop designing models, making tools, 3D printing jigs, and finalising drawings that would help me realise this ambitious project.
Ray seemed pleasantly surprised by the extent of the preparatory drawings and tooling that I had completed. He studied my dimensioned technical drawings and very kindly telephoned me a few times in advance of the first session to talk about the silver I would require, and to discuss the general approach.
Wednesday 8 April 2026
I left home at 05:30 on Wednesday 8 April 2026 and drove to Ray’s workshop, right in the heart of Faversham. His workshop is in the labyrinthine basement beneath the Gallery Kitchen Café in a building that was formerly a bottling plant for the Shepherd Neame Brewery (which is still next door). This building is now a thriving hub for various artisans, called ‘Creek Creative’.Ray shares a workshop with two hand engravers, David Bedford and David’s daughter (and former apprentice) Sarah Hobbs. The space consisted of a main room, with a small partitioned area on one side housing an industrial W. Canning Ltd. (Birmingham) polishing motor. The walls of the main room were adorned with certificates, heraldic symbols, professional photographs of finished workpieces, and numerous awards and commendations. Four jeweller’s benches—those of David, Sarah, and Ray, together with a spare for a guest—stood beside a large island workbench fitted with various vices, with stakes stored beneath. In the far corner stood his Colchester ‘Student’ lathe, alongside the soldering hearth and various anvils.
Even as I unloaded the contents of the various boxes I had brought with me, I could tell that Ray would be an incredibly attentive and excellent teacher. He was interested in how I would approach making the tubes, the bows, the garland, and the bell of the trumpet, in addition to the ornamental ball that we would be focusing on together. I explained my plan for each component of the trumpet and showed him many of the tools that I had brought with me: he offered ideas, guidance, and suggestions, and was able to gauge my overall level of experience from my answers. What was particularly refreshing with Ray was that he was always open-minded about ideas and approaches: ‘There’s more than one way to do everything’, as he put it.
From this initial discussion, it became clear that I had a good understanding of the engineering aspects of trumpet making but that I still had much to learn about the more decorative elements. I would need to adapt my skills and learn techniques associated with more decorative silversmithing work, developing the refinement and fine-detail craftsmanship more commonly associated with jewellery making. I would also need to apply the knowledge and skills I had acquired working with brass to the properties of silver—particularly in soldering, where many of the underlying principles are similar in theory, but the techniques and characteristics of the solders differ in practice.
I had purchased the silver discs required for the ball, which we had discussed over the telephone. I also cut discs of the same dimensions out from a sheet of brass. We discussed whether to start directly with the silver discs or whether to work on a brass prototype first. We decided to start in brass, and I began raising two of the larger discs to make a matched pair of hemispheres using the head of a large steel hammer mounted in the vice as a stake, and a hammer that Ray had made out of lignum vitae, an exceptionally dense wood native to the Caribbean and parts of South America. Since I was using a relatively thin gauge of metal and the two hemispheres would need to be soldered together to form a sphere, it was especially important not to thin the metal near the seam, which could easily happen if using a metal hammer.
Having formed a hemisphere using this historical method, we discussed whether this would be the most practical approach in the modern day, or whether spinning on the lathe would be preferable. This led to a discussion about what would be most historically appropriate for a replica of a trumpet from c.1700. Metal spinning became widespread during the nineteenth century (as a result of the Industrial Revolution and the advent of increasingly powerful, often steam-powered, machinery), though spinning may have existed in earlier less powerful forms. John Anderson described metal spinning in 1869 as a process that had been ‘invented in France only a few years ago’, though earlier forms may have existed. Source: Anderson, John (1869) ‘Metal Spinning’, Scientific American, 11 December 1869.
While we were discussing this subject, I showed Ray an engraving of a trumpet maker (in my book, ‘Just’ Natural Trumpet), a reproduction from Abbildung Der Gemein-Nützlichen Haupt-Stände (‘Illustration of the principal trades’) by Christoph Weigel (1654–1725), an engraver and publisher from Nuremberg—once the most important centre for brass instrument making.
Ray explained that spinning was a much more modern solution and he showed me how it could be done using his Colchester ‘Student’ lathe (noting that it is bad practice to use an engineering lathe for spinning, but that you can get away with it if using a relatively thin gauge of metal). It was good to gain experience of both methods, and it is worth noting that the hemispheres could equally have been formed using a die-stamping method, though we did not try this.
We stopped for lunch, which entailed a short walk through the centre of Faversham to a nice independent sandwich shop where Ray was on first name terms. We walked back and sat on a table just outside the café above the workshop, enjoying the best weather of the year so far. We discussed the tools that I would need to make for the rolling mill to achieve the textured patterns on the ferrules and ball stem. When we went back into the workshop, Ray showed me various examples that he has made for similar applications in the past.
After lunch, Ray gave me an introduction to silver soldering. He wrote ‘E’, ‘H’, ‘M’ and ‘Easy’ on the back of an envelope, where I was to place cleaned paillons of ‘enamelling’, ‘hard’, ‘medium’, and ‘easy’ solder on top of a small scrap of silver sheet. I was slightly surprised that he used ‘medium’ solder, as I had recently been told that many silversmiths do not use it because it doesn’t seem to flow as well as ‘easy’ or ‘hard’ solder. He suspected that I would see why it was so useful after this experiment. Ray talked me through the exercise; I was to make each solder flow in turn, starting with the ‘easy’ solder and finishing with the ‘enamelling’. Once I had done this in a methodical manner, Ray asked me to reheat each of the solders to show which would run again and which seemed to resist the temptation.
The ‘easy’ and ‘hard’ solders will flow repeatedly, but 'enamelling’ and ‘medium’ become reluctant to reflow as heating alters their composition and depletes their low-melting constituents. Once that exercise had been completed, Ray encouraged me to go too far and burn the silver by overheating it, in order to observe the changes in colour on the approach to (what would normally be) disaster. This was also a valuable exercise.
For the next exercise, I formed four W-shaped pieces of silver and soldered them onto another scrap of silver sheet, using a different type of solder for each one to solder them side by side. This was also a useful exercise, both in soldering and in getting used to the idiosyncrasies of Ray’s gas torch. I had never used a gas torch exactly like his before; it was similar to the torches I used on the course at West Dean College, however Ray’s had a pilot light, and a button to control the mix of compressed air and gas, which took a lot of getting used to for me. The dial also turned the opposite direction to the Sievert gas torch I have at home—so the end of my soldering operations would often be accompanied by a roar of flames. The engravers were fortunately unfazed by this sudden sound!
Before the first day drew to a close, I recommenced working on the brass hemispheres; Ray set up his height gauge and showed me how to mark a concentric line on each. I then used a jeweller’s frame saw to cut along the line to remove the excess material. This took a bit of practice, and I broke more than a few blades along the way. At home, I would normally do this on the lathe, using a parting-off tool to ensure a clean cut, with the work mounted on a nylon mandrel. Given my first attempts with the frame saw, which left much to be desired, perhaps I will revert to this in the future. However, there will be many other aspects of the design of the ball which will require the use of the frame saw.
Just before we left the workshop for the day, Ray showed me a book entitled ‘A Silversmith’s Manual’ by Bernard Cuzner (first published in 1935), which he leant to me to look at overnight, along with Theophilus’ twelfth century text, On Divers Arts—the most important medieval treatise on painting, glassmaking, and metalwork. These texts encompassed the philosophies of the day, as we had been using methods both ancient and modern. It seemed particularly apt that Cuzner used the analogy of musicians’ coordination to explain the agility, dexterity and harmony between the mind and body. It is also apt that this short extract continues to mention the very same dilemma I was faced with: whether to start out learning in silver or whether to use brass (gilding metal is a form of brass) at first:
‘Let us look for a moment at a few familiar instances of craftsmen in action, so that we may learn a little of the mental and physical state that is essential to the production of fine work. Think of a violinist, with his whole being concentrated on the action of fingers, hands, and body on his fiddle, with ears tense to tell him that his instrument is no longer a thing of wood and gut, but is a very part of his inmost soul. Think of a fine player of any game of skill. Of how his bat or club or racquet or cue, or whatever he may use, makes the ball obey his Will. Or at how all the members of a group of well-trained dancers will make every fibre of their being move in perfect rhythm, so that their dance becomes a part of the eternal order of Nature.After a brilliant first day, Ray and I walked to The Bear Inn and the learning continued there really, now over two pints of Shepherd Neame’s Master Brew. We discussed the importance of socialising in both of our freelance professions: music and silversmithing. Ray explained that he feels it is important to socialise with his students, to show that he is genial and approachable—and this was absolutely true.
Metals have three outstanding properties that distinguish them from all other substances. They are malleable, fusible, ductile. Metals are crystalline in structure. When subjected to strain as in cold working, the silversmiths' normal practise, the crystals are distorted, the metal hardens and becomes difficult to work. To restore its softness it is annealed, i.e., heated to about 600 deg. centigrade, a dull red, when the strain is relieved and the crystals revert to their original shapes. In working this exercise we learn that metals are malleable.
Any of the exercises given may be worked out in gilding metal, if it should be thought that silver is too costly for first attempts.’ — Bernard Cuzner (1935), ‘A Silversmith’s Manual’, p. 21
Ray’s teaching CV is very impressive, and he teaches at the likes of The Goldsmiths’ Centre and Marchmont Silversmithing Workshop (part of the Hugo Burge Foundation). As a fantastically experienced and award-winning silversmith, it seems that Ray has also established himself as something of a sounding post for some of his colleagues, especially within the association of Contemporary British Silversmiths, and he very kindly offered to do this for me as well. Ray is certainly helping to preserve and elevate his craft for future generations.
We sat outside the pub, enjoying the good weather, and several people he knew passed by and stopped for a chat. Ray is very well known in the local community of Faversham, and I met all sorts of people, including a man who has professionally photographed many of Ray’s works. Ray showed me his own unique business card which folded out to reveal many photographs of his works, including a very impressive chased lion.
Ray and I chatted about all sorts of things, including music, family life, freelancing, Time Team, and Cambodia! It transpired that Ray has appeared on the Channel 4 television series Time Team, and his son lives and brews beer in Cambodia—we both reminisced about our visits there. After dinner, I retired to a hotel and pub called The Quay, right next to Creek Creative. I had a room booked there and I spent much of the evening delving into the two books that Ray had loaned me overnight: A Silversmith’s Manual by Bernard Cuzner and On Divers Arts by Theophilus. I also searched YouTube for Ray’s appearance on Time Team. He can be seen raising a replica of a Bronze Age bucket at 17:14, 37:49, and 43:12 in series 9, episode 13, ‘Seven Buckets and a Buckle’, filmed at Breamore, Hampshire, in 2002.
Thursday 9 April 2026
Ray walked past the front of The Quay just as I finished breakfast at 08:55 on Thursday 9 April 2026. We walked the short distance to the workshop together and put the kettle on while we formed a plan for the day. My first activity was lapping the two brass hemispheres against an abrasive board, a large wooden board covered with Emery paper, to achieve a precise and fine-tuned fit. I then used a jig that I had designed and 3D-printed to mark out the repeating interval between each pattern that would be chased in later. I found that it made sense to mark the 24 dots on each half before soldering the two together. I now had two matching brass hemispheres that were marked up and ready for soldering.We set up the soldering hearth with fixtures for holding the hemispheres together and used ‘easy’ silver solder to complete the task. The revolving soldering hearth was very helpful and I resolved to find a rotating solution for my own workshop as soon as I got home. Ray’s comprised a large kiln shelf placed on top of a thick circular piece of steel: which was held in place by a central bar mounted in the jaws of an old (heavy) lathe chuck.
After soldering, the large ball was pickled and cleaned and I removed the excess solder by filing. We then looked for a way to fill it with pitch without setting the newly fitted smoke alarms off. We decided that it would be best to use the electric heat gun that I had brought with me to melt the pitch in an old tin can. Ray fashioned a spout in the can and we blocked off one end of the ball with masking tape. Ray put a metal plate beneath in case it spilled everywhere; we filled the ball with pitch and pushed a cylindrical steel bar through it. Unfortunately, it made a bit of a mess. Ray mentioned that I would certainly be able to think of a better way to do this in the future, and I have since come up with a method that catches the drips as well.
We spent the rest of the day making chasing tools for this specific application: firstly a D-shaped planishing tool and secondly an internally domed tool for outlining small decorative spheres on the workpiece. The first was formed by forging, and this was the first time I had seen this being done. Ray held a piece of steel in a pair of locking grips, and heated the steel tool to red heat. He then hammered it against an anvil while it was hot to narrow the material around the tip of the tool. He re-heated the steel tool and hammered it again until the required reduction had been achieved; files were then used to shape and refine the tip of the tool. Once we were happy with the shape and had used the tool in situ for a short while, Ray showed me how to harden the tool by taking it up to red heat and quenching it in water. He then showed me how to temper it, using a tiny pilot flame to heat the tool until a straw colour could be seen; this tempering of the tool prevents it from becoming too brittle.
We referred to my technical drawing quite regularly while we were making the chasing tools. Since the drawing was printed at a 1:1 scale, measurements could be taken from it, and tools could be offered up against it. The orthographic projections, showing the ball from different angles, were especially useful for seeing the outer parts of the ball that I nicknamed the ‘dominoes’, and the spheres and diamonds along the main seam could be seen more clearly from the top-down view. Ray remarked once again that it was great to have such clear drawings. I rely on modern technology to help me produce drawings; Ray is a wonderful artist, and I was amazed by his ability to render his drawings with lifelike shading, just using a pencil. These are some examples of his workpieces and preliminary drawings:
Sarah, one of the engravers Ray shares the workshop with, was keen to hear me play the trumpet before she left to go home, so I played one of the pair of Victorian silver trumpets I own, made by Henry Potter. I think they enjoyed the spectacle and her father, David, was particularly impressed by the engraving on the trumpet, which showcases a variety of fonts. They took a look at it under loupes and were suitably impressed. I asked Ray, David, and Sarah about how I might mark out the elaborate design on the ball and they each offered some excellent tips. I also had my design for the garland with me (ready for my trip to see Miriam), and I asked Sarah how she would go about marking it out. Printing it onto the concave surface of the garland would be basically impossible, so she suggested that the best thing I could do would be to cut the printed design into small pieces (carefully matching the different parts of the design together) and trace them on with a scriber.
In the interim
After my first two days of lessons with Ray, I had two weeks until the last three days of my chasing and repoussé lessons with Miriam Hanid in Suffolk. I would be returning to study with Ray Walton the week after that, and as I wrote in my blog about my time studying with Miriam, I came back to Ray’s workshop with a lot more experience:
‘On my visit to Ray Walton the following week, I was noticeably better at chasing. Miriam and Ray had been talking to each other and when I arrived, Ray already knew that I had some tools that would need to be hardened, once I had tried them at home and was happy with them. We completed this task on my second visit to Ray Walton’s workshop. It was so lovely that Miriam and Ray worked as such a good team and it felt as if the baton had been passed on.’Something Ray said about chasing had really resonated with me and proved hugely beneficial while I was working at Miriam's as well. He said, ‘You have to be confident when chasing’, or words to that effect, and I found this to be true. I found that the approach I take to performing on the trumpet also applied to chasing: by focusing on artistic intentions rather than the technique needed to realise them, the technique itself falls more naturally into place. If you think purely about the shape you wish to create in the metal, rather than how you are going to achieve it, you actually somehow seem to forge a more direct path towards getting there.
Wednesday 29 April 2026
I returned to Creek Creative in Faversham on Wednesday 29 April 2026. Ray and Miriam had already been in touch with each other (presumably predominantly about something else) and had also discussed my progress. Ray knew exactly what I had done at Miriam’s and that I would have an array of new tools to harden and temper.Ray very kindly did this for me, as I had seen the process last time, while I continued chasing the large brass ball. I had completed the tracing on this, but I had very little idea of what to do next. Repoussé would normally be the next step after chasing, but on a spherical item such as this, it would be almost impossible to get inside it and accurately push the metal out. Therefore, the plan was to push the metal inwards from the outside, and the highest points on the ball would be achieved simply by them not being hammered down to lower levels. This required some forethought, and a number of different marking, planishing, and texturing tools.
The ball, filled with pitch and mounted on a round bar, had a tendency to work free from the bar it was mounted on. We looked for an alternative solution to this and tried using firstly a threaded bar and later a square section bar to try and prevent the pitch from sliding along.
The central seam of the main ball is adorned with alternating patterns comprising spheres and diamonds; Ray showed me how to make a sphere by firstly outlining it using a hollow circular tool, and then pushing the background gradually away from it to leave an island-like high point behind; this was, at first, a hugely gradual process and much less satisfying than using repoussé to create the height. The D-shaped tool that we made on 9 April was invaluable for pushing the background down to expose these domed spheres. I used tools from Ray’s extensive collection as well, and we made copies of the most useful tools for my own collection. Once I had produced a few dome-shaped mounds by pushing the surrounding metal down, Ray showed me how they could be refined using small scraping and burnishing tools. These kinds of tools would have been available to William Bull, as opposed to using modern rotary shaft tools for removing scratches or for polishing. Ray loaned me his magnifying visor and I worked on the ball at x4 magnification; this was quite a comfortable level and just right for the distance I was working at.
While I had been working on the chasing, Ray was suggesting tools for me to use, and making copies of the most useful ones for me to take home. He had also been using his lignum vitae hammers to try to salvage a garland disc that I had damaged (and torn) while attempting to spin—I was in a hurry before going to Miriam’s workshop (which is mentioned in that blog post). With a tear and some folds in it, I thought it would be fit only for scrap, but Ray took it on as a side project. He gradually repaired it throughout the day, while I was chasing or otherwise occupied. I was amazed that he managed to restore it from a fairly crumpled mess, and he even repaired the torn area by soldering in a sliver of silver, which he had rolled down to fit the gap using his rolling mill. He mentioned an adage about silversmithing that reminded me of what Frank Tomes (who made my natural trumpet) used to say—something along the lines of ‘making a trumpet bell isn’t really about knowing what to do when it goes well, it’s about knowing what to do to rescue it when it starts to go badly’.
We spent much of the rest of the afternoon forging more tools for the planishing and texturing processes, and trying out ideas and tools to create the desired effect on the largest ball. I had also formed four smaller silver hemispheres, and I prepared these by lapping them into equal hemispheres, ready for soldering.
Ray and I retired to The Bear Inn and we carried on socially from where we left off. It was great to learn more about Ray and his life as a freelance silversmith. This time we talked about everything from career progression, The Holy Tavern (formerly The Jerusalem Tavern) in Clerkenwell, and him becoming a Freeman of the City of London (he’s never driven sheep over London Bridge but, as I recall, wasn’t ruling it out). The conversation flowed easily and it was a pleasure to get to know this kind, gentle, modest, and fascinating gentleman a little better, and we sent Miriam a photo after a fulfilling day of work.
Thursday 30 April 2026
I stayed overnight at The Quay again, and met Ray in the workshop just after breakfast. We made a short list of tasks for the final day which read: fluting on small ball (practice piece), make chasing texture tool(s), make a flat D-shaped chasing tool, take photos, salvage garland, and harden tools, and we actually did complete all of those tasks, and more besides, on the final day.Having already lapped the small hemispheres, I was ready to start the day by soldering them. I did this carefully and was pleased with the results. I realised that what had initially been putting me off with Ray’s gas torch was actually its loud sound. Ray’s torch sounded louder than what I was used to and even the small flame that I used for soldering the smallest ball together sounded like a comparative inferno: it sounded like my torch would sound if it was on the largest flame. I dared to change the proportion of compressed air in the mix by letting the button out, and this altered the intensity of the heat. At home, I would do this by varying the distance I was away from the soldering joint. It took quite a bit of faith to continue soldering with such a loud infernal roar coming from the torch, but I eventually allowed myself to ignore the sound of it and look for physical cues (colour, oxidation, borax bubbles etc.), and the solder soon began to flow.
And flow it did! The solder flowed well on both small balls, and I left them to pickle while I prepared the pitch. I had a new and improved system for pouring the pitch inside the balls. This system involved two cast iron pans, one used to pour from above and the other to collect the excess below. I had 3D-printed a fixture to help hold the workpiece vertically in the lower pan. The system worked well and the role of the pans could be reversed the next time they were required. I left the pitch-filled balls to cool for a while, and Ray and I discussed the texturing for the garland, and whether this ought to match the texturing used on the ball, to give continuity between these decorative aspects of the trumpet—a very good idea.
I had arrived at Ray’s a short time after studying with Miriam Hanid, and the brass garland that I had been working on was still held in pitch on my pitch bowl, ready for post-repoussé planishing and texturing work. I brought it in to show Ray: he looked at it carefully and examined the tools that Miriam, Alice, and I had made on my last day in Lowestoft. We tried the texturing tools methodically and Ray hardened and tempered them for me once we were happy with them. It is amazing what a difference that the texturing makes to the overall appearance of the piece. I continued working on this for some time, and used some of the tools from Ray’s collection as well. He also offered me the use of a small angled wooden holder that he had made to hold chasing tools up towards the chaser: this was an inspired idea. When I got home I designed and 3D-printed a case for my chasing tools that could be folded back on itself to hold the tools up at a similar angle so they could be seen end-on and more easily identified.
I retrieved the two small silver balls from the pickle and marked them out using a helix-shaped guide that I had 3D printed; this allowed me to easily mark the fluted pattern onto the metal despite the extreme curvature of the piece. I used the fluting tools that I had used extensively on the course at West Dean College, and began to chase the fluting into the balls. Ray suggested that I could be a lot more confident with the hammering, and this improved the quality of the work considerably. Once again, this was a fantastic example of Ray’s teaching style: the right advice came at the right time. I was delighted that I managed to get the small balls soldered, filled with pitch, and ready for chasing. Before I studied with Ray, I had no idea how the kind of chasing seen on the William Bull trumpet ball could be achieved; it was great to explore this under Ray’s guidance. Sarah kindly took some photographs of me and Ray in the workshop; I am holding the various brass and silver test pieces that I had been working on.
I left feeling fully satisfied and hugely positive about the project. I hadn’t completed the entire ball assembly, but that was not the purpose of the visit. I came away with the knowledge and confidence that I needed in order to be able to continue the work at home, and that was exactly what I had hoped to achieve from the outset. Ray has been so generous with his time, in fielding preliminary calls, on each workshop day, and in offering remote support in the future. He is also positive, pragmatic, talented, and inspiring. You simply couldn’t ask for more than that. I also really enjoyed sharing the workshop with the engravers David Bedford and Sarah Hobbs. This is a great partnership, and it was great to meet both of them as well. As I left, Ray said ‘All the best Russell, and please send us a photo when the baby is born’—what a lovely, caring gentleman he is.
Postlude
I had a great time studying with Ray Walton: he is a fantastically experienced silversmith and teacher, his gentle demeanour really appealed to me, and his open-mindedness is refreshing. Though I have now written at length about my time studying with him, I feel that I have hardly scratched the surface of what I actually learnt while I was there. Various sleights of hand, hard-earned tricks of the trade, and tiny pointers that can make a world of difference—Ray knows these well and shared them freely. His actions were controlled, exact, and well-considered.When I was studying at the Royal College of Music, I used to keep a diary of all my trumpet lessons. This experience with Ray reminded me of an interesting phenomenon: I could hardly write anything at all about the most inspiring lessons, or at least I felt that my writing hardly succeeded in capturing what made the best lessons so valuable. The best lessons were far less matter-of-fact than the more routine ones, and somehow resisted being reduced to words on a page—one might conclude that this is where the art lies. There were many inspiring moments, of which many were indescribable.
When I am working in my own workshop now, I can almost hear Ray’s voice—in his charming Stoke Newington-via-Faversham accent—guiding me, especially when it comes to doing a job to the highest standard. Since leaving Ray's workshop, I have come to see that both of our disciplines are, in their own ways, forms of performance. Musicians spend many hours practising in private before taking a piece to the stage. Likewise, behind every finished piece a silversmith produces lie countless unseen hours of practice, mistakes, perseverance, and patience. In both disciplines, the audience encounters only the polished and finished piece, not the early attempts—which is probably just as well!
This has been a remarkable (Wanderjahre-esque) opportunity and I have learnt a great deal from all of the makers I studied with: Malcolm Appleby, Julian Stephens, Miriam Hanid, and Ray Walton. I would like to extend a huge thank you to Arts Council England for this incredible opportunity.
Russell Gilmour
writing on music, photography, engraving, travel and life as a freelance professional musician.
Russell Gilmour's innovative new book, 'Just' Natural Trumpet, is now available: please click here for more information.
ACE DYCP
Aurora Orchestra
Bach
Baroque
Baroque Style
BBC Proms
Beethoven
Berlioz
Biber
Brandenburg
Brandenburg Baroque Soloists
Brass Instrument Making
Broadcast
Chronicles
Classical
Concert
Cornetto
Education Outreach
English Slide Trumpet
Engraving
Festival
France
Germany
Gorczycki
Guts and Glory
Göttingen Handel Festival
Handel
Haydn
Historic Royal Palaces
Horn
Instrument
Instrument Making
Interview
Isle of Man
Keyed Trumpet
Kuhnau
Le Concert Lorrain
Lecture
Leipzig
Les Talens Lyriques
London
Masterclass
Modern Trumpet
Monteverdi
Mozart
Museum
Music
Natural Trumpet
Natural Trumpet Courses
OAE
OAEducation
Opera
Orchestra of the Eighteenth Century
Oxford
Period Costume
Photography
Poland
Purcell
Radio Broadcast
Recording
Renaisannce
Review
Royal Academy of Music
Royal Society of Musicians
Schelle
Schütz
Shakespeare
Silversmithing
Solomon's Knot
Spain
Spiritato!
St. Martin-in-the-Fields
Switzerland
Taverner Consort
Teaching
Telemann
The English Concert
The Netherlands
The Section
Tour
Touring
Toyota Classics Tour 2018
Travel
Trumpet
Trumpet and Organ
Venice
Ventless
Vivaldi
Vox Luminis
Wedding
Wigmore Hall
Workshop
Wrocław Baroque Orchestra
York
Zelenka
Zugtrompete
‘Just’ Natural Trumpet
Aurora Orchestra
Bach
Baroque
Baroque Style
BBC Proms
Beethoven
Berlioz
Biber
Brandenburg
Brandenburg Baroque Soloists
Brass Instrument Making
Broadcast
Chronicles
Classical
Concert
Cornetto
Education Outreach
English Slide Trumpet
Engraving
Festival
France
Germany
Gorczycki
Guts and Glory
Göttingen Handel Festival
Handel
Haydn
Historic Royal Palaces
Horn
Instrument
Instrument Making
Interview
Isle of Man
Keyed Trumpet
Kuhnau
Le Concert Lorrain
Lecture
Leipzig
Les Talens Lyriques
London
Masterclass
Modern Trumpet
Monteverdi
Mozart
Museum
Music
Natural Trumpet
Natural Trumpet Courses
OAE
OAEducation
Opera
Orchestra of the Eighteenth Century
Oxford
Period Costume
Photography
Poland
Purcell
Radio Broadcast
Recording
Renaisannce
Review
Royal Academy of Music
Royal Society of Musicians
Schelle
Schütz
Shakespeare
Silversmithing
Solomon's Knot
Spain
Spiritato!
St. Martin-in-the-Fields
Switzerland
Taverner Consort
Teaching
Telemann
The English Concert
The Netherlands
The Section
Tour
Touring
Toyota Classics Tour 2018
Travel
Trumpet
Trumpet and Organ
Venice
Ventless
Vivaldi
Vox Luminis
Wedding
Wigmore Hall
Workshop
Wrocław Baroque Orchestra
York
Zelenka
Zugtrompete
‘Just’ Natural Trumpet
